Directly ending the Federal Reserve System through legislation is the
wrong goal, both morally and practically, for those who oppose the Fed.
Rather, we should be concerned with abolishing the legal tender laws
that largely force us to use Federal Reserve notes. If this is achieved,
the Fed will collapse under its own weight, for the Fed note could not
hope to stand up to competition with sounder currencies in the free
market.
Read the rest here: http://dailyanarchist.com/2013/03/24/end-the-fed/
Search This Blog
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
The Euphemism of Libertarianism
by Christopher Zimny
The libertarian world can be summed up, ultimately, as freedom from crime. Based on the principles of private property and non-aggression, many anarcho-capitalist writers propound and rework “ideal” visions of a “libertarian world”.
What must never be admitted into such a world by writers of this stripe is a coercive government, even when it is admitted that force will nevertheless exist such a world But there seems to be something slightly amiss in this idea, even perhaps at a first glance. Many libertarian writers theorize a world in which no force is used by individuals who make up a State, but wherein force is used by still other individuals, such as petty thieves or gun-wielding extortionists—aggression which is usually admitted as impossible to fully eradicate.
But it must be realized that insofar as one admits the existence of unwarranted force into such a society—and it would indeed be absurd to pretend that it would be otherwise—one must also admit that compulsory states exist in it too.
Read this rest on Daily Anarchist: http://dailyanarchist.com/2013/03/17/the-euphemism-of-libertarianism/
The libertarian world can be summed up, ultimately, as freedom from crime. Based on the principles of private property and non-aggression, many anarcho-capitalist writers propound and rework “ideal” visions of a “libertarian world”.
What must never be admitted into such a world by writers of this stripe is a coercive government, even when it is admitted that force will nevertheless exist such a world But there seems to be something slightly amiss in this idea, even perhaps at a first glance. Many libertarian writers theorize a world in which no force is used by individuals who make up a State, but wherein force is used by still other individuals, such as petty thieves or gun-wielding extortionists—aggression which is usually admitted as impossible to fully eradicate.
But it must be realized that insofar as one admits the existence of unwarranted force into such a society—and it would indeed be absurd to pretend that it would be otherwise—one must also admit that compulsory states exist in it too.
Read this rest on Daily Anarchist: http://dailyanarchist.com/2013/03/17/the-euphemism-of-libertarianism/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)